Margaret Hicks - AIG Life of Canada (Articles)

 AIG USED BAD FAITH AND FRAUDULENT SCHEMES AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE/POLICY HOLDER

Home Introduction Margaret's
 Story
Chronology
 of Events
Fraudulent
 Acts
Bad Faith
Insurance Practices
Coping With Major  Depression Thank You Note - Your
Comments Welcome!
News Articles about  AIG Links of Interest
 To Employees
Contact
 Information
Scoreboard Canada's
 Main Page
Conspiracy to Commit Fraud
law.jpg (3704 bytes)

Canadian Criminal Code: FRAUD
380.
(1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding ten years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
(b) is guilty (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction, where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

AIG Life of Canada's President, Mr. Peter McCarthy conspired with others to: oppress, threaten and intimidate, by using fraudulent methods that lead to Margaret Hicks' termination.  Depriving her of her livelihood and privileges secured to her, by the Constitution and the laws of Canada.
  • Why was Margaret called to an impromptu meeting (#6 chronology of events) threatening to fire her, just two weeks after they gave her a memo rewarding her for a job well done?

  • Why did AIG issue an employment warning letter on June 27, 2002, which is fraudulent in nature (also see:#9 chronology of events ) just 3 days after Margaret gave them a letter (June 24, 2002) that she would stand up for her rights?

  • Why did AIG, change Margaret's date and conditions of her performance appraisal if they were not setting her up to be fired.

  • Why did AIG's Lawyers send Margaret copies of letters that were addressed to me, regarding articles posted on the website.


    In one of the letters they state (see: #18 chronology of events,) "We further note that if your spouse, Margaret Hicks, is involved or in any way condoning this activity, then she is in breach of her employment relationship.  If this action continues, she will jeopardize her employment and potentially be dismissed for cause."


  • Why did it take 7 months for Margaret to get a cheque for short-term disability benefits?  See Bad Faith Insurance Practices.


All rights reserved Ron Hicks 2004