Part 3:

Connect the dots. Year 2010 is the target date of the Canada/US/Mexico task force's planned North American Union. Year 2010 is the year by which Canada will have had a $54.5 billion total surplus over 5-6 years. How is that "surplus" to be used? Not to restore the social programs that our government pillaged to create the surplus. It will be used to pay for the "architecture" of the "paradigm" for cooperation, i.e. the North American Union, or as they call it, the NAISP, The North America Initiative for Security and Prosperity.

What is the effect of all the bad law outlined in part 2 of this article?

It is the end of a nation. It is the end of decisions by us over ourselves. It is a reduction of our standard of living: a decline of the middle class, an increase in poverty, homelessness, and destruction of our social safety net. It is the militarization of the country. It is the creation of a police state.

How can this be? How can our government enter into these arrangements?  Who exactly is doing it? Parliament? Caucus? The PMO? We must embark on a massive campaign demanding every MP reveal his/her role in this treason. We must make each one of these agreements and arrangements an election issue. The Canadian Action party has already started its campaign to do so.

So how is it possible that our national status has come to this sorry state.

Let's consider the practice of government in this country. Canada has long suffered from an undemocratic form of government. Our Prime Ministers and their bureaucrat mandarins have always applied the defunct Prerogative Right of Kings' principle  to the exercise of their power, and gotten away with it.  The Prerogative Right is the notion that not only do the Prime Minister and his officials know best, and what is right and good for all of us, but they have a God given right to impose it on us.

How does this work in practice?  As Paul Hellyer, CAP's founding

How does this work in practice?  As Paul Hellyer, CAP's founding former leader, explained to an inquiring member of the public in letter dated March 9, 1998: "The decisions are not actually made in Caucus. In most cases, they begin with the bureaucracy, although a few policies actually originate in the Prime Minister's Office or in Cabinet. But these are the exceptions. Unfortunately, the parliamentary system is just used to propagate the ideas presented by the bureaucracy to parliament and to put them into force."

That was the case with the FTA and NAFTA.  The MPs did not read the agreements. They just accepted the lies of the bureaucrats and signed. Paul Hellyer spent his life as an elected MP.  He knows how the system works.  And he admits that he, like all the others, did not read the FTA and NAFTA before ratifying them.

Why has this practice prevailed? It has because no party has actively exposed it, nor actively challenged it (except perhaps the original Reform Party).

What is so awful is the extent of the CEO's arrogant expectation of success in the realization of their goal. Where is the outrage by MPs? By other parties? By media?  Why the acquiescence?  Those CEOs and military strategists are aided and abetted by all those Members of Parliament who are more than willing to delegate power and influence to these un-elected, unaccountable bodies.

Staring us in the eye are the powerful global forces who are successfully controlling and directing our very own governments against us. They are turning three nations into an undemocratic continental force for two purposes: 1. Externally-militarize us for their economic world conquest; and, 2. Internally- creates a police state to stifle dissent and prevent rebellion as they take everything away from us.

How Dare They!
What has become the smokescreen justification for this treason? Terrorism. What is the real reason? Greed and money. If it was only a few individuals in power, not our full government sanctioning the betrayal, a charge of treason could be laid. But because the highest order of our government is facilitating it, it is not treason. It is not treason because the perpetrators say it is not.  There is no one in charge with the will or power to face the betrayal and call it for what it is. Only the losers in a battle are prosecuted.

For far too long in Canada, bureaucrats and politicians under the undue influence of industry have been betraying all of us. Bureaucrats move easily between government and industry fulfilling the demands and interests of corporations above that of the common good of the state and its people. The concept of the public interest, or the common good, or the commons no longer exists in the bureaucracy, where once it was well defined and understood and applied.

Following WW2, despite an interlude of attention to the public good and the public interest and to world peace, the greedy exploitive agenda of the financial/ industrial/ military leaders of most of the world continued to lurk behind the scenes. They never really went away. They just laid low and bided their time.

Meanwhile, the Western world developed a burgeoning comfortable middle class as the leaders realized they had to create systems that appeased the sacrifices made by the people on the Front and at home. In Canada we developed a successful mixed economy blending the private and the public participation in our economy. The private system was left to do what they could do well, but it was recognized that some things they could not do if the needs of all the people were to be met, like housing the vets, like Medicare and hospitalization.

Eventually as peace prevailed, life got better for more and more of us. We relaxed our guard. We relaxed our vigilance over our liberty. We took it for granted. We trusted our politicians. Meanwhile, the greedy ones, smouldering in the background, re-ignited. They made their move by promoting globalization thereby cementing an arena for their use and benefit at the expense of the rest of us. Our politicians have been dupes at best, conspirators at worst. Programs, regulations, practices and procedures that made life good for the rest of us, protected our well-being and nourished us, interfered with their greed. And so, they moved- first by deception and stealth, and now in open arrogance to take away our benefits and enjoyment of a share of the world's resources. The principle is no different than it ever was under kings and mighty rulers--A few powerful taking the resources of the world for themselves by war and/or trickery and theft.

n post WW2 Canada developed some of the most successful public programs paid for in large measure by the use in our economy of our own Bank of Canada. Our successful safety net came to life making things pretty good for most of us. Hospitalization, Medicare, public housing, public education, publicly controlled energy utilities, and transportation are good examples. And we created our own public bank, the Bank of Canada, which reigned over the hiatus of the good life enjoyed by Canadians. It was the use of that bank that enabled Canadians to be creating a very good place to live, free from the enslavement of crippling debt. We could afford the good life then, and we can afford it now.

We no longer have MPs or bureaucrats with the will to act to protect and maintain a "prosperous and secure" life for the people of Canada. They plan to focus to make our territory more "prosperous and secure" for the corporate return on the resources that belong to all Canadians. Worse, they are no longer interested in a sovereign democratic Canada. They are busy creating a North American Union.  We have to expose this.

Our federal government has racked up enormous surpluses by slashing funding to people programs. They continue to lie to us pretending there is insufficient money to fund our needs. In the week of November 15,2005 the Liberals announced they had $10.2 billion to $12.5 billion of surplus money for the year 2005. In the year 2010 they expect to have $18.5 billion surplus. For the 6-year period between 2005 and 2010-11 they will have had a $54.5 billion total surplus.  (Source: Globe and Mail, November 15, 2005).

The Globe and Mail referred to the Liberal budget plan released November 15, 2005. The Globe and Mail wrote: The Liberals also unveiled a multi-year plan for growth and prosperity that's meant to serve as a blueprint for improving Canada's competitiveness in light of what Mr. Goodale calls "the profound reordering of the global economy as new giants such as India and China emerge".

Note the language congruence between the Liberal "multi-year" "blueprint" for "growth and prosperity" and the language within the various reports and agreements and plans and laws to which I referred in part 2 of the series of articles.

The June 2005 'Report of the Ministers to the Leaders' referred to their task of creating an "architecture" to effect the goals of the Leaders. The goals of the Leaders (Fox, Martin, Bush) were set out in their "Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement" signed March 2005.

On the website of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) there is a report by them of their work through 2003-2004. The report is dated April 2004 but was posted  November 2, 2005 under "News and Information" under a section called "North American Security and Prosperity". It is called New Frontiers. Building a 21st century Canada- United States Partnership in North America, April 2004.

In the preface of that report Thomas P. d'Aquino, President, and Chief Executive, along with Richard L. George, Chairman, write, "While the Council's fundamental vision for North America remains trilateral, we believe that to be most effective in addressing some of the key challenges facing our continent today. Canada and the United States must take the lead in developing a new 'paradigm' for cooperation, one that will increase the security of our respective citizens and maximize the ability of our countries to prosper in a world marked by increasingly intense competition among developed and developing countries."

In the introduction of the report, the CCCE references the competition growing from China and India, which the Liberal 2005 election blueprint mimics.  The CCCE wrote at page 2, "As emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil move up the development curve, they are growing in importance both as customers and as fierce competitors in the service s well as manufacturing sectors."

So, where will our money go that we do, in fact, have? First and foremost it will go to create the architecture of the new regime e.g. construction of different border facilities, transportation and security facilities in airports, highway, and ferry systems. Read back through part 2 of my article and you will realize the areas of expenditure to facilitate the goals. Match the words in those agreements to the words of the Liberal campaign "blueprint".

Further, out of that burgeoning surplus our government will continue to bailout and further enrich the banks by paying more and more money over to the endless unnecessary growing debt arising out of the failure to use our Bank of Canada.  The Liberals and Conservatives plan to give massive tax breaks to corporations. They will spend on the arms industry as Canada joins the US military machine.

None of this is what Canadians really want. But we are not asked. And those who complain are ignored. There is something very wrong with this picture.

The CCCE blueprint demands more deregulation and privatization. The "40 point Smart Regulations Plan" announced by our government March 2005 accommodates that demand. See Part 2 of my series of articles on this sabotage of Canada. The lie is that deregulation and privatization will be good for all of us, a betterment of the economy. In fact, they are the stripping off of all the protections for the safety and health of consumers. The legal and fiduciary duty of a private corporation, its first priority, is to use its investment to make a profit for its shareholders. The US has just recently passed a law that removes the liability of pharmaceutical companies for any harm to consumers caused by the mandatory vaccinations the US is planning. Canada will follow suit. How much more Draconian can they get?

George Galloway, a British Member of Parliament talked about the privatization of their railroads in an interview by Thom Hartmann , May 26, 2005 on Air America, AM620 KPOJ in Portland Oregon. Galloway said this: "British Rail, which was owned by the state, which was a nationalized railway, was probably the least loved institution in the United Kingdom when Mrs. Thatcher privatized it. Now, fully 80%, of the people of the country (80, eight zero percent of the people of the country) want the railway taken back into public ownership, because they realize now that we're paying three times the subsidy to the private owners of the privatized railways that we were paying to the nationalized railways, and we've got a dirtier, more dangerous, and more expensive service as a result. It takes longer now to go from London to Birmingham on the train than it does to go from where I'm sitting in the House of Commons to the Eiffel Tower in Paris, and it's only 110 miles from London to Birmingham. We've had a whole series of railway disasters caused by people cutting corners to save costs, to make more profits. We've had delays that would make your hair stand on end; people in the depths of winter being delayed 5, 7 hours on railway journeys, and we have rolling stock which has not improved since the public sector days. All that's happening is that we're giving state subsidies to private owners who are putting it in their pockets."

Privatization of any universal public needs is the vehicle for the theft of our power and control over our selves and our resources, and hence the theft of our personal and political survival.  In this country, the cheap sell-off and /or actual demolition of fully functional hospitals to and for private operations is an example of the most outrageous abuse of the public trust. As is the give-away of our hydro and gas utilities. Those who perpetrate this kind of betrayal of the public interest should be treated and punished as the criminals they are. It is no excuse to change the laws to permit it and then say it is legal. It is still immoral, wrong and harmful to society.

But the situation is getting much worse. The global regime run by a cabal of financial/military/industrialists has no borders. It needs to be able to move around the world for its maximum profit and to avoid any countries that deign to hold them accountable. It has had a great run

n the third world countries, but now wants control over the economies of the developed world by way of the trade agreements.

There is jockeying of control of areas of the world. There is the European Union power block. India/China/Russia is another emerging block. The point of the US aggression in the Middle East is to keep that rich area out of the Asian Russian block. There has to be another big block to enhance the power of the North American industrialist elite:- North American Union- NAU?( NAISP)

However, there are cracks in the globalizers success because people are not stupid. In the last 10 years the anti-globalization movement of citizens has been fighting back exposing the lies and hypocrisy and greed. They created a massive peaceful resistance movement using the tool of the Internet, and exercising their democratic rights of dissent, peaceful assembly, and freedom of movement. (This is why the US has passed a law recently that spies on internet users and gives police powers to restrict their use. Canada is following suit with a similar bill before our House of Commons.)

Citizens rushed easily to the locations of the international meetings to confront the globalizers. Politicians of the hosting countries erected barriers to separate the voice of the citizen protestors from the ears and eyes of the globalizers.  The citizens became a real nuisance. In the EU they were responsible for disseminating sufficient information to defeat the EU constitution.

It was the worldwide citizens' movement that killed the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI). It was the French politicians who finally read the stuff and agreed with the citizens and ended up being the deciding world voice that stopped the MAI in its tracks in October of 1998. In the summer of 2005, it was public pressure and an education process from the citizens' movements in France and Holland who influenced those people to vote NO on the European constitution. The other EU countries were not given the vote on the issue. Their political leaders listened to the bureaucrats, did not read, and signed. From the public interest point of view, that agreement was another economically crippling, liberty stripping and sovereignty killing arrangement.

Even though two world wars provided horrific lessons, people do not learn well from history. Too often we do not even know our history. As time passed it became easier and easier for the greedy ones to weasel their way back into the mind-set of too many politicians who have forgotten or never knew their history. Like the gambling industry that can out-wait the citizen movements who successfully oppose the gambling expansion for so long as the citizen movements can survive, at the global level, the cabal of financial /military /industrialists have waited out the global citizens movement of opposition and resistance. But, the cabal is not having an easy win. They are determined to seal the cracks and to eliminate the opposition.  What is their new tool? Anti-terrorism. Who is their facilitator? Our own government.

The answer to the irritating swarm of citizen mosquitoes is real barriers! Laws that would really prevent dissent. Laws that would stifle the capacity to stop the train. The globalists have resurrected an old bogeyman-fear, and his companion, security. Our government via its bureaucracy tells us the bad guys are around the corner or under the bed and are coming to get us.  They tell us the only way to be safe from this threat is to strip ourselves naked, point the finger at the brown skin, stop talking to each other, and submit to leashes.

The recent rapidly produced anti-terrorism laws have removed centuries-long legal rights and protections under the guise of security. These laws are nothing more than tools to enforce the globalist agenda. Let us be very clear about this. They are creating a police state. The tragedy of 9/11 was exploited to deliver suppression of the constitutional rights of citizens. The US moved first with its Patriot Act and Homeland Security Act. England, Australia and Canada followed quickly. Our politicians are hard at work with a complicit media to convince us we need to give up our liberties just as the citizens of the US have been forced to do.

The laws, the plans, agreements and arrangements implement a regime that is unconstitutional, undemocratic, and despotic; a process that consigns centuries of justice and civil and human rights to the trashcan.

We must embark on a massive campaign demanding every MP reveal his/her role in this treason. We must make each one of these agreements and arrangements an election issue.

And what is CAP going to do about it?  We are going to mount the best campaign possible in the upcoming federal election. We are going to do our best to run candidates in every riding - committed informed candidates who see the writing on the wall, who care, and who will mount the barricades.

A public policy forum group operating out of Ottawa interviewed me in September 2005. The interviewer informed me they had recently learned from their polling of Canadians that 3 out of 5 Canadians WANT MORE SAY IN HOW THE COUNTRY RUNS. Big surprise, eh?

Our challenge is to be able to communicate that CAP is a real alternative, a vehicle saved for the people to use to assert and govern ourselves.

Of interest is that the North American Union plan has no reference to any electoral government. They do not need or want a democratic government. The North American Union is not to be a system of, by, and for the people.

By the same token, for the people of Canada, United States and Mexico, the political parties currently function as patsies for the Chief Executive Officers of the NAISP. The MPs are irrelevant for our needs UNLESS we take back control of our nations.

We need Parliamentary reform, electoral reform, and inner party reform to give the people democracy. In Canada, The Canadian Action Party/parti action Canadienne is a legitimate vehicle. It remains viable to be used by citizens if they choose. A full slate of principled Canadian patriot candidates would have an impact.  It is the only democratic route. We have a real Canadian alternative party ----CAP/PAC

WE ARE CANADIAN!

Constance (Connie) Fogal (born 1940) is a long-time activist lawyer, and leader of the Canadian Action Party / parti action Canadienne. A lawyer and former teacher, Fogal lives in Vancouver where her late husband Harry Rankin was a long time progressive city councillor. She is an anti-globalization activist and was an opponent of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment and the North American Free Trade Agreement. She has also been active with the "Canadian Liberty Committee".