new world order CORRUPTION IN

THE UNITED STATES OF CANADA  
by Glen Kealey, Ottawa

Simon Reisman and Gordon Ritchie went to Washington and gave away Canada . (Glen Kealey.)

INTRODUCTION

     The power brokers of Canada should be ashamed of themselves. When - with the ingenuity and dedication to truth that mankind sometimes is capable of - King Oedipus searches for the reason why the land is waste, he discovers that he himself has been unwittingly the cause, in yielding to uncontrolled passion at the crossroads with his father and subsequently to the accoutrements of his mother's home. When he realizes the enormity of his transgressions, he gouges out the organs of sense that had betrayed him - his eyes - and his anguished cry for the wasted land becomes the cry of all humanity.

     King Oedipus is emblematic of man's descent into matter to the point that he is unable to regulate the lure or revulsion of what confronts him. We see, William Blake tells us, though not with our eyes. It is not the eyes, body, or even the land that is ultimately significant but the spiritual essence of which these material things are merely manifestations - the Sleeping Lord:

Yet he sleeps on
very deep in his slumber: 
how long has he been the sleeping lord?
are the clammy ferns
his rustling valance 
does the buried rowan
ward him from evil, or 
does he ward the tanglewood 
and the denizens of the wood 
are the stunted oaks his gnarled guard
or are the knarred limbs strong with his sap?
Do the small black horses                                                                                              grass on the hunch of his shoulders? 
Are the hills his couch 
or is he the couchant hills?                                                                                       
Are the slumbering valleys
him in lumber                                                                                                                     
are the still undulations                                                                                           
the still limbs of him of sleeping?                                                                                   
Is the configuration of the land
the furrowed body of the lord                                                                                  
are the scarred ridges
his dented greaves                                                                                                 
do the trickling gullies  
 yet drain his hod-wounds?
Does the land wait the sleeping lord
or is the wasted land 
that very lord who sleeps?

(David Jones, The Sleeping Lord)

 Every once or twice in a hundred years a voice is heard that is truly the tongue of the land. Oedipus spoke for ancient Greece . Glen Kealey speaks for modern Canada. His voice is measured, sage, profound, and firm.

     For the first time in over a hundred years - since Thomas D'Arcy McGee (one of the few Canadian politicians whose life was terminated by a bullet articulated with his golden tongue the vision of this country, we hear once more a voice from the cistern of the nation in which we have had the luck to live. Witness McGee in 1860:

   I see in the not remote distance one great nationality, bound, like the shield of Achilles, by the blue rim of ocean.  I see it quartered into many communities, each disposing of its internal affairs, but all bound together by free institutions, free intercourse, free commerce.  I see, within the round of that shield, the peaks of the Western mountains and the crests of the eastern waves. The winding Assiniboine, the five-fold lakes, the St. Lawrence, the Ottawa, the Saguenay , the St. John, the Basin of Minas, by all these flowing waters in all the valleys they  fertilize, in all the cities they visit in their courses, I see a generation of  industrious, contented moral men, free in name and in fact capable of           maintaining, in peace and in war, a Constitution worthy of such a country.

Witness Kealey at the end of this interview: Canadians believe that there is a natural boundary that engulfs the people north of the United States.  We like Americans as our neighbours.  We don't want them as our landlords. Therefore, we have to take control.

We are the largest and richest country in the world and we need to take our country back. It was stolen from us first when the Bank of Canada was established in 1935, and more conclusively when Mulroney did his Free Trade Deal. 2005 - the date of the final implementation of the Free Trade Deal - is just down the road, and we need to take our country back  NOW.  2.2% of the US population own 90% of its wealth, 60% of the natural resources of the earth. By any stretch of the imagination, that's an empire.

They have no enemies in Russia any more: Communism is a spent force. They have no enemies in the labour unions: they've bought out the leadership of both sides. They have only one enemy left: that is us, and we represent 97.8% of the Canadian population. There is no way we can be stopped, once we get organized and show that nothing can stand in the way when the vast majority of a population expresses its will in unison.

Who will fire their guns upon us? Our National Guard? They are our children, and they know this is what we have to do.  It is not simply a matter of the people of Canada against the people of the United States,  but of the people of Canada AND the United States against the invisible rulers of both countries.

On the surface, for the most part, everything is placid, innocuous, but underneath everything is seething, turbulent, colliding, revealing the shapes of evil and of good. In Occult Theocracy, Lady Queensborough tells us that the ritual of the 'warrior on the block' (after which he receives 'the seething energies of Lucifer') involves blood sacrifice, This seems to suggest that there is a direct correlation between the spilling of human blood and the acquisition of satanic energy by those responsible for the slaughter. Already in this century the blood of more than 200 million human beings has been sacrificed to prepare the earth for a new world order:  We had fed the heart on The heart's grown brutal from the fare; More substance in our enmities Than in our love; O' honey-bees  Come build in the empty house of the stare.  (W. B. Yeats, Meditations in Time of Civil War  Suddenly - and without warning -at what Yeats calls the 'interchange of the tinctures', the rules of warfare are reversed. Our fathers and oil grandfathers have 
known the trenches of Europe . Suddenly there are no more trenches and at the end of the two-thousand millennium we are engaged in some other kind of invisible warfare that is won or lost in the pulsation of an artery.  What the outcome will be nobody yet knows, but it can be said without exaggeration that we are at the most critical point in all cosmic and terrestrial history and that 'the largest and richest country in the world,' CANADA - may be the hinge on which the outcome may rest. Never before has a people been tested so severely or asked to do so much for humanity as Canadians and Americans are asked to do now.   (rod/ee 10.2.'94.)

Mr. Kealey was interviewed by George Kralik.

      Glen Kealey: The task that has been given to the taxpayers in North America is 'Be Quiet, Consume, and Die.' Most of them follow the rules very well.

      Until you have a cataclysmic event in your life - a direct face-to-face confrontation with THE SYSTEM - the brainwashing you have received first in school and later from the media, is more than sufficient to keep you and your fellow citizens living the lie. If you live through a cataclysmic event during which you come to the startling realization that the things the upholders of the system are telling you are not true, then you begin to understand the problem, but only if you are pre-disposed to integrity.

       That is why I have always said in my meetings that the country is divided into three groups: five percent are out-and-out criminals, would steal your teeth and are totally amoral - out of that group came Brian Mulroney and his brood. Five percent in the country have integrity and would do what is necessary to save it; most, however, within that five percent are still brainwashed but given the opportunity and the information they will respond.

        Those two five per cent represent the warring factions. The other 90% are brainwashed and have no real solidity or integrity: what they want is to come out on the winning side. They are the walking dead, people who are working in THE SYSTEM and even when given irrefutable facts will shut their eyes, pretend the problem is not there, and hope against hope that it goes away. They spend five days a week hoping nobody will ask them an important question, and on the weekend they grab a case of beer and take off for the lake so they can escape the possibility of being asked an important question for at least two more days. They work towards retirement so they can stay at the lake longer, the reason being that they do not want to face reality. Thus they drift through life living and sustaining a total illusion, leaching off the system.

       What they do not understand is that there are resources in the world to take care of everybody. If somebody, however, at the top grabs more than his or her share then there will be nothing left for those who are the last to choose.

       Is there any sense in a person having five billion dollars in a bank account? I mean you cannot use five billion dollars in a lifetime: all it represents are chips in a game that make impossible the survival of the ones at the bottom.

        The message we wish to bring across in this much-needed book on CANADA is how the system really functions and to shake some of our fellow countrymen out of the illusions they have been sold - hook, line, and sinker. Never expect that the ninety percent will come your way until you appear to be winning. Just be content to repeat the message to the ninety-five percent, knowing that out of the total there is a possibility of five percent coming your way.

Plate 15: The Illegal Money Trail

THE ILLEGAL MONEY TRAIL

     We have on the opposite page a diagram of the illegal money trail. You will see military, Mafia, communist, labour unions, political parties, governments, transnational corporations, old money, etc. The only thing that is not represented is people. We don't count!  Neither do we elect our governments: those are rigged before we get a chance to express our will.

     What basically happens is that international bankers who own the trans-national corporations buy the leadership of both main political parties. That is why they are listed as Party A and Party B, in Canada as Liberals and Conservatives, in the U.S. as Democrats and Republicans. It doesn't really matter who wins because they are both owned from the beginning.

      Because they do not like to expose themselves to public scrutiny, the trans-national corporations work through public relation firms, and these public relation firms employ a number of lobbyists and pollsters. The pollsters call us up at home to find out what we are thinking and report it back to the national media - which is itself trans-national. The national media then has to make a decision: do they go with us and cause the swing from the politician we detest, such as they did in the last election, or do they ridicule us to get us to change our mind?

     For example, if they want to keep the one that is there - if they think that bad as he or she is, he or she is better for their cause than the one on the ascendant - they will say or imply, 'Some stupid idiots in the country think Mulroney is crazy or is a crook but they don't know what they're talking about.' As a result, a whole bunch of sheep in the country will think, 'I don't want to be seen as an idiot so I'm not going to think like that any more,' and they switch back to their former party affiliation.

     Once the national media have written or aired enough to convince us which party we are going to vote for, then there's an election. Of course the candidates have been pre-chosen by the party and the party decides that certain people are not acceptable. If you don't believe the lies, you are not acceptable. If you believe that abortions are wrong, you are not acceptable. If you believe that there doesn't necessarily have to be a 'right' and a 'wrong' way of saying things, you are not acceptable.

From the beginning the Party realizes that what is necessary is a management group: the leader chooses them ahead of time and puts them in key ridings where they are sure to win. A second group, the back benchers, are nothing but a bunch of nice guys and gals who love to shake hands, go to cocktail parties, shut up on important questions, sit in the back row, ride around in limousines and visit the world. That is basically what you have on Parliament Hill: four or five people run the show for each political party and the rest of them are there for the smoke and mirrors. Nice people! You will never meet nicer people in your life - the nicest hypocrites you'll ever meet are on Parliament Hill. For a thousand days I stood there and saw them everyday: I know what they are like.

     When the government has been selected and it takes over, its first job is to get back to the transnationalists the money that was paid to get the politicians elected. It has, therefore, to do two things; give the corporations and the bankers tax loopholes so that they don't have to pay taxes and it also has to give the corporations money-making contracts. The procedure is as follows: they figure out the cost of a contract - say the fighter planes for five billion dollars. That amount is paid to the contractor plus a further one to five percent which the contractor passes on to the lobbyist as a lobbying fee - tax free.
     'Lobbyist' is just another word for 'money launderer'. The lobbyist then takes the money and brings it to Switzerland , Luxembourg , Cayman lslands, Litchenstein -where they all have basically the same approach to money matters - and deposit the money. So in, let us say Switzerland, this five percent from every major contract - which is money that the government doesn't have and therefore has to borrow from these same high financiers - just keeps rolling around in the same circles creating a bigger debt all the time.

     In Switzerland they have a program known as 'Rent a Swiss'. They don't actually call it that but in effect that's what it is: you get yourself a member of the Swiss nobility or other European Royalty, who has got some sort of title in front of his or her name, no money but a title, and he or she will front for this money that has just come in. Say you are dealing with a hundred million dollars. You get your 'Rent a Swiss' up front and he pretends to be a foreign investor. In Canada's case over the last nine years or so, it's been Mulroney who has been stealing the taxpayer's money, having Cabinet Ministers add five percent to the contract awarded to their favoured companies. The companies then paid that sum back to the lobbyist. Frank Moores (former premier of Newfoundland ): he was Mulroney's personal lobbyist. Moores would launder the money, and when it arrived back with a 'Rent a Swiss' as a front, the first thing they needed would be land for the construction of a building. Downtown railway land owned by the government is cheap because it is zoned railway, for example: it could be just a swamp, it could be anything that belongs to the government, but it is close to downtown. So the government will sell this plot of land at its market value, which Is cheap because it’s down-zoned as a rail yard.

     Let us say for convenience sake that one hundred thousand dollars is paid for a piece of land of five acres by the 'Rent a Swiss'. The total investment, therefore, is one hundred thousand dollars. Next, municipal politicians are bribed to change the zoning. The zoning is changed to accommodate a very high density building: the value of the land is no longer one hundred thousand dollars, but jumps up closer to twenty-five million dollars. In other words, although they've only used up a hundred thousand dollars they now own a twenty- five million dollar property.

     They then go to the bank to say that they want to build a building. The bank says, 'Well, you have twenty-five million in the kitty already. We'll put up seventy-five million as long as you can pre-lease your building to a tenant.' They go back to Mulroney and say, 'Send us the Department of Justice,' or 'Send us the Department of Public Works.' Mulroney approves a thirty-year lease and suddenly they have a fully rented building - un-built yet - but fully rented at a construction value of a hundred million dollars, which is being leased to the government for two hundred, three hundred, four hundred or maybe even five hundred million dollars over the period of the lease.

     So the money just keeps rolling around in a circle. When there are no buildings to be built, they buy bonds and affect the value of our money. By the sheer mass of money they have to invest in bonds, they can cause the currency to drop or cause it to rise. If we decide to change the Governor of the Bank of Canada to somebody less amenable to their manipulations, they will come back and say, 'We will withdraw some of our money' and thereby show you that we can cause the dollar to drop a cent, two cents, three cents - and inflation will skyrocket.
     George Kralik: Would this have been similar to the pre-referendum days?
     Mr. Kealey: Sure.
     Kralik: Is that why the bankers and big business as well as all three political parties all suddenly jumped in the Charlottetown Debate?

     Kealey: Because they are all in on it. If you look at the graph, the NDP is over on the side. It does not appear to be part of the system but the NDP - like the Mafia in Italy and Japan , like the Military Generals in South America, like the Communists in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe - are a one-party system. There was a time when they (the NDP) wanted to be in charge of the government because that's the only place the money was. Today there is another attraction - Pension Funds: they don't even need to be in the Government as long as they control the Unions and by extension pensions.
     Kralik: Is this the reason why it is pretty well mandatory for any major organization - education, military, police and fire departments, etc. - to be pressed into a Pension Fund of sorts?

     Kealey: Certainly, because it is these pension monies that are tunnelled into the international bank through their lobbyist money-launderers. Mulroney was already dipping into the Iron Ore Pension Fund even before he came to Ottawa. Bosses and labour union leaders work together to loot pension funds.

     What  happens when all of the money ends up in the one place? You will see it on your chart. They have created the United Nations. Bankers take some of their money and put it into the International Monetary Fund, lend it to a particular government but in return for a mortgage on some Natural Resources of the country - in Brazil it is the rain forest, in the Philippines oil, in the Soviet Union farm lands and oil and what have you, in Mexico oil, and in Canada it is WATER! WATER! FARM LAND!  WATER! WATER! MINES! WATER! WATER!

There comes a time, therefore, when we are lent the money stolen by banks and we can't AFFORD TO pay it back - because interest (usury) is a trick. When a banker lends money he doesn't print the money to cover the interest. If ten people borrow a dollar they must pay back a dollar plus interest, but the banker only prints ten bucks. That means from the beginning somebody ain't gonna pay his loan back because they would need eleven dollars to reimburse the ten loaned at 10% interest.
     Kralik: There is simply not enough money in circulation.
     Kealey: There is not enough money in circulation. The weakest borrower goes bankrupt. The property that is of value within that bankruptcy is sold to the others and over a period of time they choose among themselves who will become a large transnational corporation simply by what the banks allow the companies to acquire at the bankruptcies of others.

THE TRANSNATIONAL COMPANY

     Over a period of time BANKERS create transnational companies, trans-national as opposed to multi-national companies. A multi-national company is one that operates in many countries, according to the laws of those countries. A transnational company does not believe in countries. It believes in One-World Government, a One-World Order, and it demands from its national politicians the loopholes in the law that allow them to move the money out of the country before they have to pay taxes.

     I worked for a company called Gestetner for fourteen years. We sold duplicators. They were manufactured in England . The average price of a duplicator sold in Canada was a thousand bucks. Once I went to visit the plant because I kept winning these trips. From what I saw in the plant a duplicator would cost a hundred bucks to make: yet they were being sold in Canada for a thousand. Under normal mathematics, that would mean a profit of nine hundred dollars along the way and that somebody would have to pay fifty percent in income tax, or four hundred and fifty bucks. Right?

     That is not the way it happens. What the British factory did was to send the duplicators directly to Canada but to send the invoice first to Nassau, as if it was sold to Nassau. Nassau has no income tax or no corporate tax. So the invoice arrived there with the duplicator having a paper value of one hundred bucks: they could then jack up the price and send the invoice to Canada , charging nine hundred.
     According to the paperwork, then, the profit has been made in Nassau where they pay no taxes. They don't pay taxes in England , they don't pay taxes in Canada , they don't pay taxes in Nassau : the profit is therefore clear money. That is why transnational corporations want to be transnational corporations: they can move their money around the world without paying taxes.

WATER  

     Kralik: I would like to ask you about the water, our natural resources in water. What is it to be used for? How is it to be transported?

     Kealey: Think of money. If you had your choice, if you could pull a genie out of a bottle and the genie could grant three wishes, what would your three wishes be? Remember your goal is to make the most money possible?

     Kralik: I should really have to think a lot about that, but...
     Kealey: I would say: 'Number one, give me control over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air. Number three, give me control over water.' Now, leaving our little genie aside, we know we cannot control the sun, nor can we control the air, BUT WE CAN CONTROL WATER. On the scale of things that are required for human life, it is the most important element that can be controlled.

     Kralik: What do you mean when you say 'control'?

     Kealey: OK. In GATT, General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs, it says that free-flowing water is not a 'good'. The key wording is 'free-flowing'. If you construct a dam it is no longer free-flowing and therefore it becomes private property, owned by somebody, capable of being sold to others, or mortgaged.

     Kralik: If it is dammed?

     Kealey: If it is dammed. Any time the free-flowing water has been obstructed. Of course in GATT, there is much talk about bottled water.
  Kralik: It's a side trick?

     Kealey: It's a side trick. The biggest scam ever to be pulled on the entire world is Free Trade and I'll tell you why.

     There is a lady in Ottawa by the name of Shelley Ann Clark. She was the executive secretary to the third highest negotiator during the Free Trade deal. His name was Germain Denis. His two visible superiors were Gordon Ritchie and Simon Riesman. Before he became Free Trade negotiator, Simon Reisman had a difficult job. He was the director of a project called the Grand Canal, which is to be built from James Bay .

     In 1985-86, my offices were in Hull in the commercial part of Place du Portage, the government complex which houses the Supply and Services Offices. One day I was visited by a man named Art Bailey. Bailey was a former Assistant Deputy Minister of Supply and Services and had been following the development of my project, the Micot Building. I had raised a hundred and sixty million bucks to build this high tech centre in Hull.  We had bought the land and were just about ready to start construction when Art Bailey walked into my office. 'Mr. Kealey,' he said, 'you've done a fantastic job of marketing this Micot Building.  Nobody would ever have believed that anyone could raise a hundred and sixty million dollars to build a building in Hull - this is totally out of sync with anything that anybody believed. 'So he said ,'we think you're the best marketing man in Canada and that you should come and join our team and become the Marketing Manager for the Grand Canal.'

     I said, 'What the hell's the Grand Canal ? I don't know what you're talking about.' So he gave me a document - a twenty to twenty-five page document which I read. This is what I read: James Bay is five hundred miles north to south, is a hundred and twenty miles across at the mouth, salt water on the average thirty-five to forty-five feet deep. If a dam were to be constructed at the mouth of James Bay and Hudson's Bay and a second one, one third down, and a third, a third down again - therefore three dams - it would allow over a period of ten years for water to flow from the fresh water rivers and would push the salt water back beyond the dams and create the largest fresh water reservoir known to man. So much so that a canal could be built leading out of the south-east corner of James Bay, south over the mountain ranges with dykes and locks and whatever you need to lift water for eight hundred miles, then at Rouen-Noranda in northern Québec, nature's gravity would take over and the water would start going down the other side of the mountain range, into Ontario, the Ottawa River and the French River systems, past Kirkland Lake and eventually it would end up in Georgian Bay. The amount of water that would be brought back - fresh water from that Canal - could double the flow of water that now enters the Great Lakes . Of course, if you can double the water entering the Great Lakes , you can take half of the total water out without changing anything in the Great Lake System.

     The water would be removed in two places: at the base of Lake Michigan - they don't need it this year, this year they have enough water - they would open up the sluices and move water down to the Mississippi Delta, almost all the way to Mexico, into the Gulf of Mexico; the second outlet would be from Lake Superior, moving water across Manitoba, into Saskatchewan, then down into the United States to bring water to the Mid West and South West of the United States. We must understand, of course, that since we are living in a period of global warming, the bread basket of North America, which is situated in one place now, moves further north as it gets warmer, making the bottom part arid. So water is absolutely critical to enlarge the bread basket of North America as the earth gets warmer.

     There is another dimension: if Canadian waters, presently flowing into and towards the Arctic and the North of Canada, are diverted and artificially made to flow in a southerly direction (for instance diverted towards the United States for water use), then the Northern cold climate temperatures will move in a southerly direction and the Canadian terrain will become colder and more frigid; the balance of the Canadian climate will be reduced in temperature, which will cause a massive environmental shift in Canada, all to Canada's detriment.

     This theory can be supported by simple physics and hydrology. The waters flowing north are of a warmer temperature and have a warm front pushing against the Arctic North temperatures; if removed, the Arctic North will move South. It doesn't matter whether this occurs in summer or the winter seasons. If the rivers and waters are diverted to flow southerly then one will require more fuel to heat our homes and buildings; however, Canadians will only have what is available after the US has its needs supplied under the NAFTA Agreement, etc.

     The two transnationals who were pushing this plan were R.J. R. Nabisco (the biggest agribusiness in the United States), led by a Mr. Johnson out of Winnipeg - there's been a film made of him recently called Barbarians at the Gate and it shows how he tried to take over the company with junk bonds and whatever; and the other one was Archer Daniels Midland, who cans and boxes or packages all of the agribusiness that comes in from R.J.R. Nabisco and distributes it throughout the world. It is interesting, of course, that Mr. Johnson was Mulroney's sponsor, bringing him on tours throughout the U.S.  and that Archer Midland Daniels has just hired Mulroney as a director.

     I travelled across Western Canada and there have been public demonstrations recently in B.C., Alberta, and Saskatchewan over the building of dams and Kemano in B.C., Old Man River in Alberta and Alimeda in Rafferty dams in Saskatchewan. People ask why are they building dams where there is no water. Once you understand the relationship of the Grand Canal to the entire area you then know where the water will be coming from.

     Kralik: Do you see any possible ecological disasters as a result of this?

     Kealey: Of course. Some natives believe the sheer weight of the water behind the dams will cause the axis of the earth to shift and if you build a dam you change the chemistry of the earth. You cannot flood the areas that we are talking about without changing the configuration of the soil and landscape. But transnationals don't think in those terms: they think in terms of money. In 1985-6 it was stated that the project would cost two hundred billion dollars (US ). It was also stated that the money was available. American Express wants to be the banker and do you think that it is by coincidence that American Express was allowed, by Order of Council, to become a Bank in Canada, with Brian Mulroney breaking fourteen banking regulations just to allow them to achieve this status?

     As well, Alcan Aluminum needs dams for their mines and Barrick for their gold-owning concerns. Mulroney also signed Orders in Council breaking the law that made it illegal for foreigners to own more than fifty percent of a mine in Canada. Now foreigners can own mines outright in Canada: there are no restrictions.

     None of these changes in the rules were made through Parliament but by a stroke of Brian Mulroney's pen. Most people in Canada live with the illusion that laws are written by parliament but most regulations are changed by politicians in power. For every law that passes through Parliament, there are three thousand laws that are changed unilaterally behind the scenes.

     In any case, Simon Riesman put forward a plan to have us put aside our 'old concepts' and to start thinking 'boldly about the future'. By that he meant nothing less than giving up Canada: we need to have a new political reality, he argued, and therefore Free Trade and water diversion go hand in hand. We also know, he surmised, that if the US asked us for either water or free trade, Canadians would rebel: so let us make it appear that Canada is doing the asking. Mulroney was bought with the Bankers' money and he did the asking, publicly stating the opposite of what he had always contended: that he didn't believe in Free Trade, etc.